Mastering Microscopy and Cell Structure: Common OCR A Level Biology Questions Answered

Mastering Microscopy and Cell Structure: Common OCR A Level Biology Questions Answered

Prior Knowledge to Recap

Before diving into microscopy and cell structure, make sure you're confident with these key concepts:

Basic cell structure – understanding the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, and being able to identify major organelles like the nucleus, mitochondria, and chloroplasts

Units of measurement – being confident with converting between millimetres (mm), micrometres (μm), and nanometres (nm) is essential for magnification calculations (1mm = 1000μm, 1μm = 1000nm)

The concept of magnification – knowing that magnification = image size ÷ actual size, and being able to rearrange this formula

Resolution versus magnification – understanding that magnification makes things appear larger, whilst resolution is the ability to distinguish between two separate points

Light and lenses – appreciating how light microscopes use glass lenses to magnify specimens, and that electron microscopes use electrons instead of light

Links to GCSE Content

This topic builds directly on your GCSE Biology knowledge:

Using a light microscope – at GCSE you learned to use a light microscope to observe cells; now you'll learn about different types of microscopes (electron microscopes and laser scanning confocal microscopes) and their specific applications

Animal and plant cells – GCSE covered basic cell structures visible under a light microscope; A level explores the much higher resolution images from electron microscopes that reveal ultrastructure

Preparing slides – you may have prepared simple slides at GCSE; A level requires precise techniques for slide preparation, staining methods, and understanding why specific procedures are used

Common Question Types and How to Answer Them

Let me walk you through five frequently asked questions from past OCR papers, showing you exactly what examiners are looking for.

Question 1: Preparing a Blood Smear (Practical Technique)

How to approach this question:

This is testing your practical knowledge of slide preparation – a key skill in microscopy. The examiners want to see that you understand the precise method, not just vague statements.

Model Answer using markscheme points:

  1. "Use pipette to place blood (sample) on slide" ✓

  2. "(Place blood) near one end (of slide)" ✓

  3. "Use (2nd) slide/cover slip to spread/smear blood across slide" ✓

  4. "Slide/cover slip at an angle" ✓

(Award 3 marks maximum from these points)

Markscheme guidance - What to write:

  • You can answer using an annotated diagram if you prefer

  • ACCEPT "smear" as equivalent to "spread"

  • For additional valid point (AVP): ALLOW "allow to (air) dry"

What NOT to write:

  • Don't describe staining procedures – the question says the smear will be stained later

  • Don't talk about focussing the microscope – that's outside the scope of this question

Examiner insight from markscheme:

"Most candidates scored at least one mark on this question, usually marking point 1, and many achieved all 3. Marking points 3 and 4 were also frequently given. No credit was given for describing staining or focussing as these were outside the scope of the question."

Key technique points to remember:

The blood smear technique is specific:

  1. Small amount of blood placed near one end of the slide

  2. Second slide held at an angle (typically 30-45°)

  3. Pushed/dragged across the first slide to create a thin smear

  4. This creates a monolayer of cells that can be examined individually

Why this technique matters:

  • Creates a thin enough layer for light to penetrate

  • Allows individual cells to be distinguished

  • Prevents cells from overlapping

Question 2: Comparing Microscope Resolution

Answer: A

Why this is correct:

You need to know the resolution of each microscope type (this is examined frequently!):

Microscope Type Maximum Resolution Light microscope 200 nm (lowest) Laser scanning confocal microscope 200 nm (same as light) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) 3-10 nm Transmission electron microscope (TEM) 0.5 nm (highest)

Therefore the correct order from LOWEST to HIGHEST resolution is:

Light microscope (200 nm) → Scanning electron microscope (3-10 nm) → Transmission electron microscope (0.5 nm)

Common mistakes:

Students often confuse:

  • Resolution with magnification (they're different things!)

  • The two types of electron microscope

  • Laser scanning confocal with electron microscopes

Key distinction:

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM):

  • Scans surface of specimens

  • Produces 3D images

  • Resolution: 3-10 nm

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM):

  • Electron beam passes through thin specimens

  • Produces 2D images

  • Highest resolution: 0.5 nm

  • Can see internal structures (ultrastructure)

Memory aid: "TEM is Top for resolution, SEM is for Surfaces"

Question 3: Completing a Microscope Comparison Table

Correct Answers:

Image appearance 2D / 3D 2D2D

Image colour named colour/colouredblack and white ✓ black and white

(Mark each row)

How to work this out:

Row 1: Image appearance

  • SEM produces 2D images (despite showing surface detail that looks 3D)

  • TEM produces 2D images (flat sections through specimens)

  • The markscheme awards 1 mark for this row

Row 2: Image colour

  • Laser scanning confocal uses fluorescent dyes → coloured images

  • Both electron microscopes produce black and white images originally

  • The markscheme awards 1 mark for this row

Important clarifications:

Why does SEM image appearance = 2D?

This confuses many students because SEM images look 3D. However:

  • The data captured is 2D (a flat image)

  • The depth perception comes from shading and shadows

  • Technically it's a 2D representation of a 3D surface

Some markschemes accept "3D" for SEM, but this one specifically wants "2D"

What about confocal image colour?

The markscheme accepts:

  • Named colour (e.g., "green", "red")

  • "Coloured" (general term)

  • Confocal microscopes use fluorescent tags that emit specific colours

Question 4: Identifying Biological Drawing Errors

Part (i): Identify ONE incorrect label and explain your answer. (3 marks)

Model Answer using markscheme:

Incorrect label: ribosome ✓

Explanation:

  • "Cannot see with this/light microscope" ✓

  • "(Light microscope) resolution not high enough/too low" ✓

OR

  • "(Light microscope) magnification not high enough/too low" ✓

  • "It is a nucleus" ✓

Markscheme guidance - What to write:

  • ALLOW "not visible/cannot be viewed/detected" for "see"

  • ALLOW "resolution not sharp/clear/strong/detailed enough"

What NOT to write:

  • Don't just say "structure shown too large" – need to explain why it can't be seen

  • Don't say resolution is "strong" or "weak" – use "high" or "low"

Why ribosomes can't be seen with a light microscope:

The limiting factor:

Light microscope resolution = 200 nm

This means two points closer than 200 nm apart cannot be distinguished

Ribosomes (20-30 nm) are much smaller than this limit!

Examiner insight from markscheme:

"any three from:

  • label lines should not cross ✓

  • no arrowheads ✓

  • no shading/colouring in ✓

  • give magnification/scale ✓

  • give title ✓

  • draw cell walls as two lines ✓

  • draw organelles in proportion ✓

(Award 3 marks maximum)"

Markscheme guidance:

  • ALLOW "must be parallel" (for label lines)

  • ALLOW "give diagram a name" (for title)

  • ALLOW reference to "nuclei/structures labelled as ribosomes, too big"

The rules for biological drawings:

DO:

  • Use a sharp pencil

  • Draw continuous, clear lines

  • Draw label lines with ruler (straight, not crossing)

  • Draw in proportion to what you see

  • Include title and magnification

  • Draw cell walls as double lines (showing thickness)

DON'T:

  • Use shading, colouring, or sketchy lines

  • Add arrowheads to label lines

  • Draw things you can't actually see

  • Make structures disproportionately large or small

Common marking points students miss:

Many students know about "no shading" and "sharp pencil" but forget:

  • Magnification must be stated

  • Title should identify the specimen

  • Proportion is critical – organelles must be correctly sized relative to the cell

Question 5: Why Cells Need to Be Stained

Model Answer using markscheme:

"Create/provide/increase contrast" ✓

"Make cells/(named) component(s) visible" ✓

OR

"Cells/(named) components can be identified/distinguished/differentiated" ✓

(Award 2 marks for a complete explanation)

Markscheme guidance - What to write:

  • ACCEPT "(named) organelle(s) stand out from surroundings"

  • ACCEPT "regions/parts/AW of cell"

What NOT to write:

  • Don't just say "clearer" – this is too vague (IGNORE according to markscheme)

Examiner insight:

"Most candidates knew that staining made cell components visible and many also understood that the stain increases the contrast."

Why staining is necessary:

The problem with unstained cells:

Most cells and their components are transparent or translucent when viewed under a light microscope because:

  • Cell structures are mostly made of water, proteins, and lipids

  • These materials don't absorb much light

  • Little contrast exists between different structures

  • The cytoplasm and organelles look similar

What staining achieves:

  1. Increases contrast between different structures

  2. Makes specific components visible that would otherwise be transparent

  3. Allows differentiation between cell types

  4. Enables identification of particular organelles or structures

Different types of staining:

Simple staining:

  • Uses one dye

  • All cells/components stained the same colour

  • Example: Methylene blue stains all cells blue

Differential staining:

  • Uses multiple dyes

  • Different components stain different colours

  • Allows identification of specific structures

Common stains you should know:

How stains work:

Stains are typically charged molecules that bind to oppositely charged components:

  • Positively charged dyes (e.g., methylene blue) bind to negatively charged DNA/RNA

  • Negatively charged dyes (e.g., eosin) bind to positively charged cytoplasmic proteins

Additional Question: Improving Slide Preparation

Describe TWO ways in which this procedure could be improved. (2 marks)

Model Answers using markscheme (award 2 marks maximum):

  1. "Place stain at edge of sample (not the centre)" ✓

  2. "Lower cover slip at an angle/use mounted needle" ✓

  3. "Use blotting paper to remove excess stain/pull stain through" ✓

  4. "Use more than one stain (to improve contrast)" ✓

Markscheme guidance - What to write:

  • Mark as prose (not bullet points required)

  • IGNORE "use forceps/lay sample flat"

  • ALLOW "place stain at side of sample"

  • ALLOW stated angles given e.g., 45°

  • ALLOW "tissue/paper towel instead of blotting paper"

  • ALLOW "ensure stain covers whole sample"

What NOT to write:

  • Don't mention aseptic technique (not relevant here)

  • Don't talk about adding water

  • Don't mention wearing gloves

  • Don't mention pressing down on cover slip to remove air bubbles

Examiner insight:

"Candidates who had a practical knowledge of slide preparation scored well, mentioning lowering the cover slip at an angle or using blotting paper to remove excess stain, as ways to improve the method. However, many candidates wrote about aseptic technique, adding water, wearing gloves, or pressing down on the cover slip to remove air bubbles, which gained no credit."

The correct staining technique:

Step 1: Position the stain correctly

  • Place stain at the edge of the sample (not in the centre)

  • This allows stain to diffuse through the sample evenly

Step 2: Lower cover slip at an angle

  • Hold cover slip at approximately 45°

  • Touch one edge to the slide first

  • Slowly lower the opposite edge

  • This prevents air bubbles from being trapped

Step 3: Draw stain through (optional but better)

  • Place blotting paper on opposite side of cover slip

  • The paper draws stain through by capillary action

  • Removes excess stain

  • Creates even distribution

Step 4: Remove excess stain

  • Use blotting paper around edges

  • Prevents background staining

  • Creates clearer image

Why each step matters:

Top Tips for Exam Success Based on Markscheme Guidance

1. Practical technique questions need SPECIFIC detail:

  • ✓ "Place blood near one end of slide"

  • ✗ "Put blood on slide" (too vague)

2. Know your microscope specifications:

3. For biological drawing questions:

Remember the 7 key rules:

  1. Sharp pencil, clear continuous lines

  2. No shading or colouring

  3. Label lines straight (with ruler), no arrowheads

  4. Draw in correct proportions

  5. Include title (identifying specimen)

  6. Include magnification/scale

  7. Only draw what you can actually see

4. Understand the difference between:

Resolution = The ability to distinguish between two separate points

  • This is fixed for each microscope type

  • Cannot be adjusted by the user

  • Determined by the wavelength of light/electrons used

Magnification = How much larger the image appears compared to actual size

  • Can be changed by using different objective lenses

  • Formula: Magnification = Image size ÷ Actual size

  • Not the same as resolution!

5. Staining questions - key points:

When asked "Why stain cells?":

  • Always mention "increase/provide contrast"

  • State that it makes cells/specific components visible

  • Can mention identification/differentiation of structures

When asked about staining method:

  • Stain at edge not centre

  • Cover slip at an angle

  • Use blotting paper for excess

  • May use multiple stains for differential staining

6. Common mistakes to avoid:

Common Error Why it's wrong Correct answer "Staining makes cells clearer" Too vague "Staining increases contrast between structures" "High magnification gives better resolution" Magnification ≠ resolution "Electron microscopes have higher resolution than light microscopes" "Ribosomes can be seen with light microscope" Too small (20-30 nm) "Ribosomes cannot be seen - below 200 nm resolution limit" "SEM images are 3D" Technically 2D data "SEM produces 2D images of surfaces" (though may appear 3D)

Understanding Examiner's Comments from Markschemes

The markschemes include valuable "Examiner's Comments" that reveal common mistakes. Here are the most important ones for this topic:

On blood smear preparation (Q1): "No credit was given for describing staining or focussing as these were outside the scope of the question."

  • Lesson: Read the question carefully - only describe what's asked for!

On pond water slide preparation (Q2a): "Many answers discussed improving the method in terms of not pouring the pondwater on the slide but suggested a smear approach, not appreciating that a smear would effectively be a dried sample that would not be appropriate to observe the contents of pond water."

  • Lesson: Different specimens need different preparation methods!

Misconception highlighted: "Many candidates believe that dyes are required to see anything using a light microscope. Dyes are required to distinguish cell types and subcellular structures. Organisms can be seen under a light microscope without the need for a colour contrast."

  • Lesson: Staining improves visibility and increases contrast, but isn't always essential to see something

On biological drawings (Q9): "Some answers discussed the label lines and lack of arrow heads as a piece of evidence without appreciating the question refers to both figures to support the student's statement and not just a list of rules for a good biological drawing."

  • Lesson: Always relate your answer to what the question is specifically asking

On staining procedures (Q10iv): "Candidates who had a practical knowledge of slide preparation scored well... However, many candidates wrote about aseptic technique, adding water, wearing gloves, or pressing down on the cover slip to remove air bubbles, which gained no credit."

  • Lesson: Practical experience is invaluable! But always focus on what's relevant to the question

Practice Strategy

To master this topic effectively:

1. Get hands-on practical experience

  • Actually prepare slides yourself - blood smears, pond water, onion cells

  • Practice using a light microscope with different objective lenses

  • Try different staining techniques

2. Make comparison charts Create a detailed table comparing all microscope types - this is tested repeatedly

3. Practice biological drawings

  • Draw from real microscope images (not from textbooks)

  • Follow all 7 rules strictly

  • Get feedback from your teacher

4. Learn the specifications exactly

  • Memorise the resolution values for each microscope type

  • Know which produces 2D vs 3D images

  • Understand colour vs black and white images

5. Use the markschemes

  • Read the "What NOT to write" sections carefully

  • Understand why certain answers don't get credit

  • Learn from the Examiner's Comments

6. Link practical to theory When you do a practical, ask yourself:

  • Why am I using this technique?

  • What would happen if I changed this step?

  • How does this relate to the microscope's limitations?

Quick Reference Guide

Resolution (lowest to highest): Light (200 nm) → SEM (3-10 nm) → TEM (0.5 nm)

Magnification (lowest to highest): Light (×1500) → SEM (×100,000) → TEM (×500,000)

Image appearance:

  • Light/Confocal: 2D or 3D

  • SEM: 2D (of surfaces)

  • TEM: 2D (of sections)

Image colour:

  • Light: Natural or with stains

  • Confocal: Fluorescent colours

  • SEM & TEM: Black and white

Can use with living specimens:

  • Light: YES

  • Confocal: YES

  • SEM: NO (vacuum, coated)

  • TEM: NO (ultra-thin sections)

The 7 rules of biological drawing:

  1. Sharp pencil, clear lines

  2. No shading/colouring

  3. Straight label lines, no arrows

  4. Correct proportions

  5. Title included

  6. Magnification stated

  7. Draw only what's visible

Why cells are stained:

  • Increase/provide contrast

  • Make cells/components visible

  • Enable identification/differentiation

Remember: examiners reward precision, practical knowledge, and correct terminology. The difference between a good answer and a great answer often lies in the specific details you include!

Good luck with your revision! 🔬🧫